iI've been using static line for lanyards for a long time. There is so little line in the system that any fall onto a lanyard would hardly generate enough force to factor in line stretch.
If you understand how stretch is calculated you'll see that most arbo ropes are pretty close to being static lines. The stats are close.
That stat is based on the amount of stretch at a percentage of the breaking strength. That catch is that there is no standard way to measure this number. When I first started to learn about rope construction I had the opportunity to spend close to an hour talking with Dick Hildebrand about the stretch measurement.
If you took a brand new rope off the weaving machine you would find that the rope has lots of stretch. After climbing on the rope the fibers would be pulled into linear alignment. Instead of being coiled so to speak, they'd be pulled out. The used rope would stretch "less". What Dick told me they did was to take a rope, put a load on it and hold for a length of time. Then the load would be removed and the rope would recover. This would be repeated, bringing the load up over seveal cycles. When they go to the load they wanted, they measured the amount of stretch.
Stretch is based on a percentage of rope. So, if there were 100' of rope and there was a load of X on it, the rope might stretch three feet. That would give a 3% stretch at that load. Now, take the same rope and make a lanyard. The lanyard is 15' long. Apply the same load and how much would the rope stretch? about 5.4" But...how could a climber fall far enough to even generate a large load if they're using a lanyard?
On my rec saddles I use a 3/8" static line.
Tom
Strong limbs and single ropes!
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.